Review



neural agrin  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems neural agrin
    Neural Agrin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 66 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__17__709302-71-6-9?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 66 article reviews
    neural agrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress mature myotubes
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Mature Myotubes, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/pmc13045380-84-0-11?v=MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mature myotubes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals anti agrin
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Anti Agrin, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/pm41887219-989-47-49?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti agrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals nbp2 14546 rrid ab 3261932 anti agrin novus biologicals
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Nbp2 14546 Rrid Ab 3261932 Anti Agrin Novus Biologicals, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/pm41887219-877-36-39?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nbp2 14546 rrid ab 3261932 anti agrin novus biologicals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals nbp1 90209 rrid ab 11029656
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Nbp1 90209 Rrid Ab 11029656, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/pm41887219-877-43-39?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nbp1 90209 rrid ab 11029656 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems neural agrin
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Neural Agrin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__17__709302-71-6-9?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neural agrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti agrn
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Anti Agrn, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/us12576191-378-6-8?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti agrn - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems 6624 ag
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    6624 Ag, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/us12576191-141-9-6?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    6624 ag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems recombinant agrin 550 ag
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Recombinant Agrin 550 Ag, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/us12576191-354-7-10?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant agrin 550 ag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems agrin peptides
    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in <t>myotubes</t> differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Agrin Peptides, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agrin/us12576191-141-0-6?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agrin peptides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in myotubes differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

    Article Title: Fibro‐Adipogenic Progenitors Regulate Orofacial Neuromuscular Junction Regeneration via Myostatin

    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70264

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FAPs accounted for the disparity in NMJ regeneration between MAS and TA muscles. (a) AChR and MyHC immunolabelling in myotubes differentiated from MuSCs isolated from MAS or TA muscles. Mature myotubes were treated with or without agrin (100 ng/mL) for 16 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the right panel show the quantifications of differentiation index (upper left), myotube width (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left), ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower middle) and Chrna1 expression quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (lower right). n = 3. (b) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs single culture and cocultures with different FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. Graphs in the lower panel show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster density and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) Schematic of the direct coculture of different FAPs with MAS‐derived MuSCs. (d) Representative images of tdTomato + FAPs and α‐BTX labelled AChRs (green) in recipient MAS and TA muscle. Scale bar = 20 μm. (e) Schematic of the FAPs transplantation assay. (f) Quantification of BTX signals per field. n = 6 mice/group. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a, upper right panel). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (a, lower right panel and f). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mature myotubes were treated with 100 ng/mL agrin (HY‐ P79236 , MedChemExpress, China) in DM or conditioned medium (CM) of 7 dpi FAPs supplemented with 2% HS for 16 h. For recombinant MSTN treatment, 100 ng/mL MSTN (HY‐ P72632 , MedChemExpress, China) with or without 500 ng/mL follistatin (HY‐ P70315 , MedChemExpress, China) was administered together with agrin treatment.

    Techniques: Muscles, Isolation, Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Staining, Derivative Assay, Transplantation Assay

    MSTN was the paracrine factor that distinguishes MAS‐derived FAPs from TA‐derived FAPs. (a) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSC single culture or cocultures with conditioned medium (CM) of MAS‐ or TA‐isolated FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of myotube area, average AChR cluster size, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 6. (c) Venn diagram depicting the overlap among DEGs between 7 dpi MAS‐ and TA‐derived FAPs (orange), NMJ‐regulating genes (green) and genes encoding secreted proteins (blue). (d) Mstn expression levels were quantified by qPCR. n = 3. (e) Myostatin levels were quantified by ELISA in CM from 7 dpi MAS‐ or TA‐derived FAPs. n = 3. The data are shown as mean ± SD. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). Unpaired Student's t test was used in (d,e). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

    Article Title: Fibro‐Adipogenic Progenitors Regulate Orofacial Neuromuscular Junction Regeneration via Myostatin

    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70264

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MSTN was the paracrine factor that distinguishes MAS‐derived FAPs from TA‐derived FAPs. (a) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSC single culture or cocultures with conditioned medium (CM) of MAS‐ or TA‐isolated FAPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of myotube area, average AChR cluster size, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 6. (c) Venn diagram depicting the overlap among DEGs between 7 dpi MAS‐ and TA‐derived FAPs (orange), NMJ‐regulating genes (green) and genes encoding secreted proteins (blue). (d) Mstn expression levels were quantified by qPCR. n = 3. (e) Myostatin levels were quantified by ELISA in CM from 7 dpi MAS‐ or TA‐derived FAPs. n = 3. The data are shown as mean ± SD. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used in (b). Unpaired Student's t test was used in (d,e). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mature myotubes were treated with 100 ng/mL agrin (HY‐ P79236 , MedChemExpress, China) in DM or conditioned medium (CM) of 7 dpi FAPs supplemented with 2% HS for 16 h. For recombinant MSTN treatment, 100 ng/mL MSTN (HY‐ P72632 , MedChemExpress, China) with or without 500 ng/mL follistatin (HY‐ P70315 , MedChemExpress, China) was administered together with agrin treatment.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Staining, Isolation, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Recombinant MSTN suppressed AChR clustering and miR‐206 expression. (a) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs cultures treated with or without recombinant MSTN (100 ng/mL) and follistatin (500 ng/mL). Scale bar = 50μm. (b) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) The levels of miR‐206 expression in MuSCs cultures. Mature myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs were treated with control, agrin alone, agrin plus MSTN or agrin plus MSTN and follistatin. (d) AChR and MyHC staining of myotubes transfected with miR‐206 mimics or negative control (NC) prior to treatment with agrin and MSTN. Scale bar = 50 μm. (e) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. The data are shown as mean ± SD. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

    Article Title: Fibro‐Adipogenic Progenitors Regulate Orofacial Neuromuscular Junction Regeneration via Myostatin

    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70264

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Recombinant MSTN suppressed AChR clustering and miR‐206 expression. (a) AChR and MyHC staining of MuSCs cultures treated with or without recombinant MSTN (100 ng/mL) and follistatin (500 ng/mL). Scale bar = 50μm. (b) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. (c) The levels of miR‐206 expression in MuSCs cultures. Mature myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs were treated with control, agrin alone, agrin plus MSTN or agrin plus MSTN and follistatin. (d) AChR and MyHC staining of myotubes transfected with miR‐206 mimics or negative control (NC) prior to treatment with agrin and MSTN. Scale bar = 50 μm. (e) Graphs show (from left to right) the quantification of differentiation index, myotube area, AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area and ratio of AChR/myotube area. n = 3. The data are shown as mean ± SD. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mature myotubes were treated with 100 ng/mL agrin (HY‐ P79236 , MedChemExpress, China) in DM or conditioned medium (CM) of 7 dpi FAPs supplemented with 2% HS for 16 h. For recombinant MSTN treatment, 100 ng/mL MSTN (HY‐ P72632 , MedChemExpress, China) with or without 500 ng/mL follistatin (HY‐ P70315 , MedChemExpress, China) was administered together with agrin treatment.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Expressing, Staining, Derivative Assay, Control, Transfection, Negative Control

    MSTN knockdown reversed the negative effect of MAS FAPs on in vitro AChR clustering. (a) MSTN protein and mRNA level in 7 dpi MAS FAPs transfected with negative control (pGPU6/GFP/Neo‐NC) or knockdown vectors (pGPU6/GFP/Neo‐shMSTN). (b) MSTN protein and mRNA level in 7 dpi TA FAPs transfected with negative control (pcDNA3.1(+)) or overexpression vectors (pcDNA3.1(+)‐MSTN). (c) Representative images of AChR and MyHC staining (left panel). Graphs in the right panel show the quantification of differentiation index (upper left), myotube area (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left) and ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower right). CM was collected from NC and MSTN KD FAPs and added to myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs. Scale bar = 50 μm. n = 3. (d) Representative images of AChR and MyHC staining (left panel). Graphs in the right panel show the quantification of differentiation index (upper left), myotube area (upper right), AChR cluster density (lower left) and ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower right). CM was collected from NC and MSTN OE FAPs and added to myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs. Scale bar = 50 μm. n = 3. (e,f) Transcript levels of Chrna1 , Chrne , Chrng , Musk and Rapsn in myotubes treated with CM from NC or KD FAPs, and NC or OE FAPs. KD, knock down; OE, overexpression. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a–d). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc test was used in (e,f). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

    Article Title: Fibro‐Adipogenic Progenitors Regulate Orofacial Neuromuscular Junction Regeneration via Myostatin

    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70264

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MSTN knockdown reversed the negative effect of MAS FAPs on in vitro AChR clustering. (a) MSTN protein and mRNA level in 7 dpi MAS FAPs transfected with negative control (pGPU6/GFP/Neo‐NC) or knockdown vectors (pGPU6/GFP/Neo‐shMSTN). (b) MSTN protein and mRNA level in 7 dpi TA FAPs transfected with negative control (pcDNA3.1(+)) or overexpression vectors (pcDNA3.1(+)‐MSTN). (c) Representative images of AChR and MyHC staining (left panel). Graphs in the right panel show the quantification of differentiation index (upper left), myotube area (upper right), AChR cluster counts normalized to myotube area (lower left) and ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower right). CM was collected from NC and MSTN KD FAPs and added to myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs. Scale bar = 50 μm. n = 3. (d) Representative images of AChR and MyHC staining (left panel). Graphs in the right panel show the quantification of differentiation index (upper left), myotube area (upper right), AChR cluster density (lower left) and ratio of AChR/myotube area (lower right). CM was collected from NC and MSTN OE FAPs and added to myotubes differentiated from MAS‐derived MuSCs. Scale bar = 50 μm. n = 3. (e,f) Transcript levels of Chrna1 , Chrne , Chrng , Musk and Rapsn in myotubes treated with CM from NC or KD FAPs, and NC or OE FAPs. KD, knock down; OE, overexpression. The data are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t test was used in (a–d). Two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc test was used in (e,f). ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mature myotubes were treated with 100 ng/mL agrin (HY‐ P79236 , MedChemExpress, China) in DM or conditioned medium (CM) of 7 dpi FAPs supplemented with 2% HS for 16 h. For recombinant MSTN treatment, 100 ng/mL MSTN (HY‐ P72632 , MedChemExpress, China) with or without 500 ng/mL follistatin (HY‐ P70315 , MedChemExpress, China) was administered together with agrin treatment.

    Techniques: Knockdown, In Vitro, Transfection, Negative Control, Over Expression, Staining, Derivative Assay